Friday, 30 March 2012

Cine-Excess VI


The Cult Film Archive is the world's only research centre devoted to the study of cult film. The Archive is run under the directorship of Xavier Mendik, one of cult film's great academics, and each year hosts a conference in London. This year's looks to be especially interesting.

Titled Transglobal Excess: The Art and Atrocity of Cult Adaptation, the conference focuses on 'global adaptations of cult narratives, genres, themes and icons across a broad range of media and fiction formats. From pulp novels into pulp horror films and recent big budget blockbuster remakes of marginal midnight movies, to nationally defined interpretations of the pre-established extreme, the cult image remains a fascinating index of adaptation, whose wide array of remakes, renditions and realisations frequently reveals fascinating issues of nation and narrative, as well cultural, regional and historical distinction.'

Of particular interest to cult film fans are sure to be the two guests of honour, none other than Italian schlockmeisters Enzo G. Castellari (Keoma, The Inglorious Bastards, Bronx Warriors) and Sergio Martino (Torso, The Violent Professionals, Mountain of the Cannibal God) whose work 'both trades on themes and national traditions of cult adaption'.

Also taking part is Texas Chainsaw Massacre scriptwriter Kim Henkel who will be judging a competition for new screenwriters and reading their pitches for horror films.

The conference takes place 24 to 26 May 2012 at the Odeon Covent Garden & The Italian Cultural Institute, London

For more details go here

Saturday, 17 March 2012

Demons Within: Exorcism Movies



To tie in with the UK release of The Devil Inside, Starburst has published an article I wrote on exorcism movies – Demons Within: a history of possession films from The Exorcist (1974) to The Devil Inside (2012). Along the way it stops off to look at some rare pea-soupers like The Sexorcist (1974) and Magdalena, Possessed by The Devil (1976) as well as the more mainstream fare like Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977) and many more besides. I had a lot of fun writing it. Starburst is pretty pleased with it and I think you will enjoy it too. In fact it might even turn your head around! Head over to Starburst for a read.


While you’re over there why not order issue 375 of Starburst? Just look at the goodies in this month’s issue:
Game of Thrones / Exclusive Interview with George R R Martin / Exclusive Interview with 'The Cabin in the Woods' Director Drew Goddard / Hunger Games / Interview with Josh Hutcherson / Doctor Who / Interview with 'Wrath of the Titans' Director Jonathan Liebesman / Bond / Interview with New 52 'Batman' & 'Swamp Thing' Writer Scott Snyder plus News, Views & Reviews from the Worlds of TV, Film, Comics, Games & More…





Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Strippers vs. Werewolves (2012)


Strippers vs. Werewolves is not the usual kinda stuff that I go to see. But I gritted my fangs for Starburst Magazine and off I went to a screening...

You can read what I thought here.

Book Review: Hammer Fantasy and Sci-Fi by Bruce G. Hallenbeck

Hammer Fantasy & Sci-Fi is one of the latest books from Hemlock Books, a new independent publisher specialising in genre-related film titles. Best-selling author Denis Meikle (A History of Horrors: The Rise and Fall of the House of Hammer, Roman Polanski: Odd Man Out, Vincent Price: The Art of Fear) set up Hemlock only a few short years ago and already has an impressive list of titles under the company’s belt including David Tappenden’s Fright Films, Mind Warp (an account of Roger Corman’s New World Pictures) by Christopher Koetting and Bruce G. Hallenbeck’s The Hammer Vampire. With more quality titles in the pipeline (include X Cert - a retrospective of 1960s and 1970s British Horror Cinema by Beasts in the Cellar author John Hamilton) Hemlock is rapidly becoming one of the best genre film publishers around.

You can read my review of Bruce Hallenbeck's book here.

Sunday, 11 March 2012

Vanishing on 7th Street (2010)

Brad Anderson is, for me, one of the best – if not the best – director working in psychological horror today. The Machinist (2004) is already an acknowledged classic.  Session 9 (2001) continues to disturb, intrigue and mystify. Sounds Like (2006) was, along with John Carpenter’s Cigarette Burns (2005), the best of the Masters of Horror series. Anderson combines the best of Hitchcock and Polanski in his ability to use pure cinema to unsettle and unnerve. He is, in fact, so good at psychological horror that the social commentary in his films often passes unnoticed by critics. It is there. In Session 9 there is the abandoned asylum, a relic from a time when people would be incarcerated against their will simply because they were considered too burdensome to remain in broader society. Dozens of huge asylums like the one in Session 9 stand abandoned in the United States and Britain, a shameful reminder of our less-than –tolerant-past when it came to treating mental illness. In Session 9, this sense of horror and shame – akin to that one senses in concentration camps – pervades the film.


In Vanishing on 7th Street, a group of characters band together in a Detroit bar to fight against an inexplicable enemy. When darkness comes, those who are not protected by a light source – such as a torch - simply vanish, leaving only their clothes behind. The film opens in a cinema. Projectionist John Leguizamo, is changing the reels when the lights suddenly go out. When he goes to investigate he finds the entire cinema suddenly empty, except for clothes and possessions left on the seats and in the aisles. Where has everyone vanished to? It is a surreal premise - one that begs a metaphorical or even philosophical meaning. The setting of Detroit, in particular, has allegorical resonance. In real life as well as film the once thriving ‘motorcity’ is now a ghost town; industry has ended there. Houses stand empty. People have left. Like in Vanishing on 7th Street only shadows remain. And the creeping darkness threatens to encroach into other cities, with similar results.




Indeed in Anderson’s films, the inexplicable only happens to the workers: the blue collar stiff in The Machinist, the office drone in Sounds Like, the tradesmen builders in Session 9. In these films, the workplace itself becomes a site of horror. The personal insanity of the characters is possibly caused by their working environment, certainly is made worse by it. The mundane yet highly stressful job of the machinist, Christian Bale, seems, at first to be the thing that is tipping him over the edge. In Session 9, the impossibly short timescale of the building contract pressures the men unduly, making them increasingly tired and disorientated –and susceptible to the influence of the asylum and the malignant forces it holds within its walls. In Vanishing on 7th Street all the characters are separated from loved ones because of the pressures of work. Thandi Newton is a junior doctor forced to leave her baby at home while she does her shift. Hayden Christensen is a news reporter whose job takes him away from home, only to find his girlfriend vanished once he returns. For these characters, their lives are vanished and now their very existence is at stake. In fact their final line of defence against vanishing is to protest their existence, as John Leguizamo attempts to. As the workers in real life Detroit tried to.


Vanishing on 7th Street borrows heavily from Night of the Living Dead in this sense. A small group of characters are besieged by an inexplicable, even absurd, apocalypse (that are filmic allegories of real world events). Both films share the absurdist tragedy of the playwright Eugene Ionesco, whose The Chairs featured only two characters in a post-apocalyptic world proliferated by threatening chairs. Ionesco’s play spoke to the absurdity of the nuclear age in 1952, Romero’s film to the absurdity of intergenerational conflict in the 1960s, and Anderson’s films seem to speak increasingly to the absurdity of economic collapse in present day America.


Anderson has an uncanny ability to take the familiar environments of American towns and cities and make them impersonal and strange. In Vanishing on 7th Street the abandoned streets of Detroit take on an unreal sheen. In The Machinist,  West Coast American details – cars, phone kiosks – were added to Barcelona Streets (where the film was shot) to disorientate the viewer. The film is set in America and it looks like America - and yet it doesn’t quite.



This sense of jet-lagged disorientation is heightened by Anderson’s masterful use of sound. Anderson often drops out the atmosphere track, leaving only a single sound source in isolation. The effect is to create a dislocated state of mind like that of descending in a plane when your ears pop, leaving everything slightly surreal. In Sounds Like, Anderson made this sense of heightened sound the basis of the story.

Even in an indifferent Anderson film like Vanishing on 7th Street all of these characteristics are present. Despite the lacklustre script, Anderson’s gift for subtle psychological horror – and his peerless ability to render it on film – shines through. For that alone It is worth seeing.

Thursday, 1 March 2012

A Report from Frighten Brighton


Hammer fans were in for a treat at Frighten Brighton last Saturday. Centre-piece of the mini festival was a screening of Frankenstein and the Monster From Hell (1973) introduced by Shane Briant biographer, Richard Kenchington , followed by a specially recorded video introduction by the man himself.

Shane Briant Biographer, Robert Kenchington
Robert and Shane shared some terrific anecdotes about the making of the film, especially concerning the legendary star, Peter Cushing. At the time of filming, Cushing was in poor health after the recent death of his wife and asked for reduced involvement in the film. Briant’s role, as the idealistic Dr Simon Helder, foil to Cushing’s unscrupulous Frankenstein, subsequently grew as many of the scenes originally written for Cushing were adapted for him. Briant more than holds his own in the film; both he and Cushing give strong performances. However, Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell was to become – as Robert rightly commented – a film of ‘lasts’; Hammer, by 1973, were beginning to ail as a company. Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell was shot in 1972 but would not be released until two years later due to distribution problems that Hammer were having with EMI at the time.
Good news is that a Blu-Ray of Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell is due for release later this year, and will feature a fully uncut version of the film restored from a newly unearthed pristine print. Robert revealed that an uncensored print was recently discovered in a vault in Los Angeles and is forming the basis of the restoration. What’s more, the Blu-Ray disc will feature commentaries from Shane Briant and Marcus Hearn, author of the recent Hammer Vault. Hearn is overseeing the Blu-Ray.

Also at Frighten Brighton were Hemlock Books, an independent publisher specialising in genre-related film-titles. Author Denis Meikle set up Hemlock to distribute books, magazines, comics and collectables and they have an impressive back catalogue. Hemlock also publish their own titles including David Tappenden’s Fright Films, Mind Warp (an account of Roger Corman’s New World Pictures) by Christopher Koetting and Bruce Hallenbeck’s The Hammer Vampire. Future publications include X Cert - a retrospective of 1960s and 1970s British Horror Cinema by Beasts in The Cellar author John Hamilton. I came away with a copy of Hallenbeck’s Hammer: Fantasy and Sci-Fi which I will be reviewing for Starburst Magazine.

Frighten Brighton organisers Scare Sarah and Cyberschizoid
On Sunday 4th March there’s a triple bill of Shane Briant movies – Captain Kronos, Vampire Hunter (1972) + Picture of Dorian Gray (1973) + Beyond Dorian (short, 2010) at the Roxy Bar and Screen in London Bridge, London. (Doors open at 2pm).
The screening has been organised by Frighten Brighton’s Richard Gladman and Sarah James as part of their Classic Horror Campaign. Richard set up the campaign to persuade the BBC to bring back their iconic Saturday night classic horror double bills which were so popular in the 1970s and early 1980s. The campaign has grown from an online petition and now includes a website, a Facebook page and a regular series of classic horror double bill screenings around the UK. The campaign is being  fronted by UK Scream Queen Emily Booth and is currently supported by various celebrities including Jeremy Dyson, Andy Nyman, Reese Shearsmith, actress Eileen Daly, best-selling author David Moody and Hammer Horror stalwarts Caroline Munro and, of course, Shane Briant.

The next Frighten Brighton event is due to take place in August. I’ll be there!

Thursday, 23 February 2012

Starburst returns

Issue 374 Limited Edition Variant Cover Designed by
Dez Skinn with art by Glenn Fabry
Starburst Magazine returns to print this month! Issue 374 is now available to order by subscription and on sale in specialist outlets. I’m a big fan. Starburst introduced me to the world of SF, Fantasy and Horror way back in 1981. It was in Starburst where I first read about George Romero, Wes Craven, Pete Walker and many others.

The magazine is now edited by Jordan Royce with original Starburst creator Dez Skinn as honorary-editor-in chief and the quality is high.

Starburst has also relaunched as an online website, with site exclusive features and reviews. With an iPad edition on its way the goal is synergy between the magazine, the website and the iPad edition and a reason to read each of them. The website will be an up to date source of news and events with reviews and news posted daily.

In the magazine there are regular columns on horror movies, Doctor Who, TV Zone and an extensive review section (with John Brosnan’s old spot ‘It’s Only a Movie’ now written by editor Jordan Royce.) News Editor, Kris Heys heads up the news column, ‘Things To Come’.

The first issue is a zombie special in a nod to classic issue 48 (an issue close to my heart!) and available in a choice of cover. You can order a copy or take out an annual subscription by heading to the Starburst Magazine website. You can also buy copies from London’s The Cinema Store, Forbidden Planet, and Travelling Man. 

Why not visit the Starburst website now and read my reviews of George A. Romero's Bruiser (now available on UK DVD for the first time) and George Ochoa's new book Deformed and Destructive Beings.

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Frighten Brighton

I'm looking forward to Frighten Brighton this Saturday. Organised by the indefatigable Cyberschizoid and Scare Sarah this event looks to be a lot of fun. As well as a market of horror related merchandise and author book signings, we are promised a free screening of Frankenstein and The Monster From Hell (1973) in the afternoon (2pm) and in the evening a double bill of HG Lewis's The Gore-Gore Girls and the classic Re-Animator (1985) (5pm - £6 admission)

Taking place in the Rock Inn in Brighton, Cyberschizoid is also laying on a horror quiz in between the screenings in the evening. I may not be sober by then.

The event starts at 12pm at The Rock Inn, 7 Rock Street, Brighton, BN2 4NF this Saturday 25th February.

Thursday, 16 February 2012

The Hamiltons (2006)

Concluding the series on degenerate families started with We Are What We Are is this low budget indie made by the Butcher Brothers in 2006. The Butcher Brothers is the AKA for Mitchell Altieri and Phil Flores. The Hamiltons is their little-seen but well received debut as a producing/directing team. It won the Santa Barbara and Malibu film festivals but only received a limited theatrical release by Lionsgate before its DVD release in 2007.

Following the mysterious death of their parents, a family of orphans move into a house in a small mid-west industrial town. David, the eldest, has taken on the responsibility of care for his siblings: twins, Darlene and Wendall, and Francis, the youngest. Things are not easy when you have lost both parents, and David is struggling to hold the family together. Francis is making a video about them all and harbours his own doubts – will they be able to stay together now that Mum and Dad are gone? Things are made even harder by the fact that Wendall has kidnapped two girls and is holding them captive in the basement of the house, where something hungry and maybe not human is also being kept under padlock and key.

Like Mum and Dad, The Hamiltons starts off resembling a piece of torture porn but emerges as a something else entirely. As in We Are What We Are the degeneracy of the Hamiltons is shown to be an extension of normal family values rather than a deviation from them. ‘The family that slays together stays together’ as it were.

At first it appears that Wendall alone is the cause of all the family’s problems, but the film reveals that there is more to it than that. He is hot-headed, compulsive, a sexual psychopath and David covers up for him, hiding the truth from the world in order to protect his siblings so that they can stay together. But then we begin to realise that David is more involved than we first thought – and shares in his brother’s bloodlust. David seeks out his own victims in the young men he lures home and buries under the house. And we already know that Darlene is one twisted sister and enjoys an incestuous relationship with her twin Wendall to boot.

Only Francis, the youngest, seems, at first, untouched by the family's pathology. He is just trying to figure out where he belongs. Camcording his siblings shows his alienation and his investigation into the nature of his family – and into his own nature. He can’t help but empathise with Sam, the only surviving girl in the cellar. Like Junior in Last House On The Left (1972) and Ruby in The Hills Have Eyes (1976) he represents the possibility of change, of breaking away from the family pathology. As far as Wendall is concerned Francis has yet to ‘pop’ his cherry – “We do what we do to survive”, Wendall tells him. The bleak barren industrial landscape corroborates his sentiment. In some respects The Hamiltons are just another family struggling to survive in modern America, and their attitude that ‘family comes first’, even if it is to the cost of society as a whole, is a peculiarly American one, redolent of the conservative values that persists in some parts. Francis, it seems, is going to be forced to make a choice: stay true to his family or stay true to himself.



At least that is how it appears until he helps Sam to escape and we discover that it was the Hamiltons' father who first taught them how to take what they need from their victims. Francis battles his nature when he sees Sam is bleeding. “We’re born, not made” he tells her. But finally even Francis can’t fight against who, or what, he really is… and the creature in the cellar – Lenny – is another Hamilton...

In many ways The Hamiltons is part of the pastiche movement of the modern horror film. It resembles, in its harsh flatly-lit look, rough-hewn 1970s horrors like Three on A Meathook (1972) and Deranged (1974). After The Hamiltons, the Butcher Brother went on to remake Fred Walton’s 1986 April Fools Day, so they have a foot in the modern horror industry of remakes, pastiches and sequels. But overall this is more intelligent than the average pastiche. For the most part, The Hamiltons critiques the idea of family survival at any cost – presenting it as a pathology – a ‘feeding’ on the rights of others. The film falters, though, in its final reveal. Francis cannot change because of what is revealed as his ‘nature’. He must therefore accept who he is. The problem is that film then conveniently forgets the degeneracy of the family and asks us to sympathise with the Hamiltons who, after all, can’t help their nature and are ‘just trying to fit in.’ (It's interesting that David's homosexuality is coding for his sexual psychopathology, in contrast to Afredo's in We Are What We Are, which is presented as a potential road to liberation from the repression of his degenerate family.)



Shame that The Butcher Brothers ultimately settle for the more conservative message: perhaps they will subvert it in their proposed sequel – The Thompsons. I have yet to see The Violent Kind (2010) but I would say on the back of this horror debut that The Butcher Brothers are among the most interesting horror directors around at the moment.

Thursday, 26 January 2012

Book Review: Shock Value by Jason Zinoman

The Peter Biskind approach to film history (Easy Riders, Raging Bulls) at its best captures – in its life and times methodology – a sense of the defining cultural moment,  of how events and personalities conspire to create a new epoch.  At its worst it falls into tittle-tattle and gossip (like Biskind’s latest book on Warren Beatty). Jason Zinoman’s Shock Value falls somewhere in between.


The book’s full title is Shock Value: How a Few Eccentric Outsiders Gave Us Nightmares, Conquered Hollywood, and Invented Modern Horror. This makes it pretty plain that Zinoman intends to follow the Biskind approach, only instead of charting the revolution of Hollywood by the Movie Brats of the 1970s, Shock Value focuses on the revolution of the horror film by directors like Romero, Carpenter, Hooper and Craven. Zinoman’s main conceit is that up until Rosemary’s Baby, horror was stuck in the doldrums of gothic schlock and rapidly losing its audience. Then along came films like Targets and Night of the Living Dead that revived the genre by creating a ‘New Horror’ set in the modern everyday world. Zinoman describes the exact moment that this happened: during a television programme called The Mike Douglas Show in June 1967. Vincent Price, the guest, is taken to task by Dr Frederick Wertham about the ‘harm’ that horror films do to children. Price defends his films as harmless fun, full of silly capes and goofy costumes. Protesting that real horror is not the violence of the movies but the real-world violence of Vietnam, Price inadvertently admits his own - and along with it, ‘Old Horror’s - irrelevance. Meanwhile, in Hollywood, Roman Polanski prepares to film Rosemary’s Baby and the rest is history. It’s a great story - Zinoman never lets the facts get in the way of a great story – and so it is with the rest of the book.

The Biskind approach relies on conflict to create an entertaining narrative. In Easy Riders this arises mainly from the clash of egos between free-wheeling eccentrics like Hal Ashby and the Hollywood suits.  In Shock Value there is tension between ‘Old Horror’ and ‘New Horror’, dramatized in the case of Rosemary’s Baby, in the conflicting approaches of Roman Polanski and his producer, old-school schlockmeister, William Castle. There is bitterness between Dan O’Bannon and John Carpenter, who fell out after making Dark Star together. There are creative differences between Sean Cunningham (the moneyman) and Wes Craven (the artist) on Last House on The Left. This makes for an engaging read on the whole but sometimes it feels a little forced. In “The Problem with Psycho” Zinoman argues that the notion that Hitchcock invented the modern horror film with Psycho and The Birds is overstated. Although the younger directors were influenced by Hitchcock, he claims, they also rebelled against him. It’s an interesting point but one Zinoman never really manages to back up adequately, relying too much on reports of personal slights and a bit of old gossip (such as the occasion when Hitchcock instructed the young William Friedkin to wear a tie on set.) As a piece of film criticism, it simply does not stand up to the likes of Robin Wood and Christopher Sharrett, both of whom have argued for the primacy of Psycho and The Birds much more persuasively…

Zinoman had access to most of the directors in the book, and is clearly a skilled interviewer. One of the best things about Shock Value is the way Zinoman prises intimate details about their personal histories from the film-makers; vividly told, these offer new insight into their lives and work. We learn about the parental feuds that made Tobe Hooper come to dread mealtimes and family get-togethers; we learn how a troubled home life lies behind the voyeurism theme in Brian DePalma’s films. Perhaps most touching is the account of how Wes Craven’s life fell apart prior to his making Last House on the Left as he struggled against the conformism of his Baptist background. These sections alone make the book worth spending money on.

Déjà vu does set in at times. Sometimes Zinoman’s narrative momentum falters and he lapses into a ‘making of’ commentary – this is especially so in the chapter on Alien. Zinoman retells the story of how Dan O’Bannon conceived the original story, how Ridley Scott came on board etc. Really there isn’t much new here and I found my attention wandering.

There are also, as many reviewers have noted, a lot of factual inaccuracies: far too many for me to want to go into them all here. (There is an excellent review by Jon Putnam that lists all of the book’s mistakes, which you can read here.) I will say, however, that these mistakes sometimes make you question how well Zinoman knows the actual films. Describing Last House on The Left, for example, he writes ‘a character is slashed to death with an electric boat fan.’ Perhaps he was thinking about I Spit on Your Grave. Unfortunately when you read such a mistake as early as page two (‘Krug carves the word ‘love’ onto his victim’s chest’) it immediately makes you doubt the writer, which is a shame, because inaccuracies not-withstanding, Shock Value is a worthwhile read.


Buy it, then, if you are looking for an entertaining overview of 1970s American horror cinema.

Jason Zinoman is appearing at the Roxy Cinema in London on 29 January 2012 where he will introduce a double bill of Texas Chainsaw Massacre + Shivers. Info here